Confidential, without prejudice and subject to contract?

I'm negotiating a contract with a potential reseller (software services). He produced a document listing the points we agreed at a meeting.  At the top it is marked "Confidential, without prejudice and subject to contract". What does "without prejudice" mean in this situation?

Not very much.

It's usual for "heads of terms" (aka heads of agreement, heads of terms) to be confidential, and usually at least some or all of their provisions are not binding (hence "subject to contract").

However, the words "without prejudice" are used by lawyers in inter-party communications in the context of litigation, or a dispute which may lead to litigation. If a communication is without prejudice then in principle it should not be put before a judge during litigation. The phrase makes little sense in the context of non-contentious contractual negotiations.

For a summary of the without prejudice rule, see:

Contact details

Howbery Park, Wallingford
Oxfordshire OX10 8BA, UK
Tel: +44(0)1491 821123

English law

Unless otherwise stated, the information and resources on this website relate to English law.

Web cookies

By using our website, you agree to our use of web cookies. See our privacy policy for details.

Our ecommerce websites

Copyright © 2007-2013 SEQ Legal LLP.